Key Milestones in the Evolution of Knowledge Management: What Is Next?

The history of knowledge management (KM) is often categorized into three early eras: the first era focused on tools and technologies to ensure valuable knowledge was shared and preserved. The second era emphasized knowledgeable people and how to better connect them. The third era brought the focus to bear on content and the findability of valuable knowledge. What came next? World events such as 9/11 and the COVID-19 pandemic intensified awareness of and need for effective KM. The introduction of the knowledge management standard, ISO 30401, in 2018 is a more recent key milestone. What is next? More holistic and more inclusive KM is one important direction for the field. KM scalability beyond individuals, groups, and organizations spreading to interorganizational and societal KM is another important direction for the evolution of KM. Finally, more research needed to better integrate artificial intelligence (AI), support remote work, cope with increasing information overload, formulate key KM competencies and training approaches, as well as leverage KM to enhance innovation (in addition to improving efficiency). This essay discusses and integrates a number of perspectives and key studies from the KM community but presents a predominately personal view and position on the future evolution of KM.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save
Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (France)
eBook EUR 139.09 Price includes VAT (France)
Hardcover Book EUR 179.34 Price includes VAT (France)
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others

Introduction: Managing Knowledge in the Twenty-First Century
Chapter © 2018

Using Work Context and Levels of Expertise to Foster Person-to-Person Knowledge Exchange: A Concept for Connecting Knowledge Workers Based on (Socio-) Psychological Theories
Chapter © 2013

Knowledge Management Systems – The End of the Road?: Position Paper
Chapter © 2014
Notes
American Productivity and Quality Centre https://www.apqc.org/
References
- Ahmad, F., & Karim, M. (2019). Impacts of knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Workplace Learning, 31(3), 207–230. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ahmed, M. (2017). Evolution of knowledge management in business. Engineering Management Research, 6(2), 32–46. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ammirato, S., Linzalone, L., & Felicetti, A. (2021). Knowledge management in pandemics. A critical literature review. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(4), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1801364ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Andriessen, D. G. (2008). Stuff or love? How metaphors direct our efforts to manage knowledge in organisations. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 6(1), 5–12. Google Scholar
- Apte, S., Lele, A., & Choudhari, A. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic influence on organizational knowledge management systems and practices: Insights from an Indian engineering services organization. In Proceedings, knowledge and process management. Mar 28:10.1002/kpm.1711. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1711. PMCID: PMC9088537.
- Behme, F., & Becker, S. (2021). “The new knowledge management” Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/articles/emea103993_the-new-knowledge-management/DI_Thenew-knowledge-management.pdf accessed on March 2023.
- Boyes, B. (2019). Where are we at with the big new things in knowledge management? Real KM. Accessed January 10, 2023, from https://realkm.com/2019/12/20/where-are-we-at-with-the-big-new-things-in-knowledge-management/
- Bratianu, C., & Bejinaru, R. (2019). The theory of knowledge fields: A thermodynamics approach. Systems, 7(2), 20. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bratianu, C., & Bejinaru, R. (2020). Knowledge dynamics: A thermodynamics approach. Kybernetes, 49(1), 6–21. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burley, D. (2020). Knowledge management back in focus for 2021. COVEO. Accessed January 10, 2023, from https://blog.coveo.com/knowledge-management-strategies/
- Clark, S. (2020). The state of knowledge management in 2020. Accessed January 10, 2023, from https://www.reworked.co/knowledge-findability/the-state-of-knowledge-management-in-2020/
- Dalkir, K. (2017). Knowledge management in theory and practice (3rd ed.). MIT Press. Google Scholar
- Dalkir, K. (2021a). KM, analytics and AI: A winning combination to survive the post-truth world. In J. Liebowitz (Ed.), A research agenda for knowledge management and analytics (Chapter 10) (pp. 171–190). Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
- Dalkir, K. (2021b). Knowledge governance: Addressing complexity throughout the knowledge processing cycle. In P. de Sá Freire, S. Hawamdeh, & G. Dandolini (Eds.), Knowledge governance & learning for organizational creativity and transformation (Chapter 2) (pp. 15–34). World Scientific. ChapterGoogle Scholar
- Davenport, T. (2015). Whatever happened to knowledge management. The Wall Street Journal, June 24, 2015. Google Scholar
- Drucker, P. (1959). The Landmarks of tomorrow. Harper and Row. Google Scholar
- Durst, S. (2021). A plea for responsible and inclusive knowledge management at the world level. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. Available from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2021-0204/full/html.
- Evans, M., Dalkir, K., & Bidian, C. (2015). A holistic view of the knowledge life cycle: The knowledge management cycle (KMC) model. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 47. Google Scholar
- Fallman, D. (2020). Six trends for 2021. The future of knowledge management. Mindbreeze. Available from https://inspire.mindbreeze.com/blog/six-trends-for-2021-the-future-of-knowledge-management
- Fouad, N. A. (2020). Editor in chief’s introduction to essays on the impact of COVID-19 on work and workers.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119, 103441. Google Scholar
- Garfield, S. (2018). What is the future of knowledge management? Available from https://stangarfield.medium.com/what-is-the-future-of-knowledge-management-bdd0cc774d57
- Greer, T. W., & Egan, T. M. (2019). Knowledge management for organizational success: Valuing diversity and inclusion across stakeholders, structures, and sectors. In Connecting adult learning and knowledge management (pp. 119–136). Springer. ChapterGoogle Scholar
- Hajric, E. (2021). How knowledge management can help your business cope with Covid19 or any crisis. Wagepoint. Retrieved January 9, 2023, from https://wagepoint.com/blog/how-knowledge-management-can-help-your-business-cope-with-covid19-or-any-crisis/
- Handzic, M. (2017). The KM times they are a-changin. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 13(3), 7–28. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heisig, P. (2015). Future research in knowledge management: Results from the global knowledge research network study. In Advances in knowledge management (pp. 151–182). Springer. ChapterGoogle Scholar
- Hopkins, J. (2020). What is knowledge management evolution? Capacity. Accessed January 26, 2023, from https://capacity.com/knowledge-management/faqs/what-is-knowledge-management-evolution/
- International Standards Organization (ISO). (2019). ISO 22301:2019 Security and resilience—Business continuity management systems. Retrieved January 11, 2023, from https://www.iso.org/standard/75106.html
- Johannessen, J. A. (2017). Knowledge management in future organizations. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(2)(c. 2), 306–318. Google Scholar
- Kay, A. S. (2003). The curious success of knowledge management. In C. W. Holsapple (Ed.), Handbook on knowledge management 2: Knowledge directions (pp. 679–687). Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
- Koç, T., Kurt, K., & Akbıyık, A. (2019). A brief summary of knowledge management domain: 10-Year history of the journal of knowledge management. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 891–898. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee, M. R., & Chen, T. T. (2012). Revealing research themes and trends in knowledge management: From 1995 to2010. Knowledge-Based Systems, 28, 47–58. Google Scholar
- Nakash, M., & Bouhnik, D. (2021). Knowledge management is not dead. It has changed its appearance. And it will continue to change. Knowledge and Process Management, 28(1), 29–39. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Needham, J. L., Beazley, K. F., & Papuga, V. P. (2020). Accessing local tacit knowledge as a means of knowledge co-production for effective wildlife corridor planning in the Chignecto Isthmus, Canada. Land, 9(9), 332. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press. BookGoogle Scholar
- Pugh, K., & Stewart, T. (2013). Knowledge is the business. In F. Prowting (Ed.), Unlocking value: KM as a strategic management tool (pp. 49–60). Ark Group. Google Scholar
- Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. University of Otago Press. Google Scholar
- Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books. Google Scholar
- Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9–27. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Trees, L. (2020). “How KM can support diversity, equity and inclusion”. Available athttps://www.apqc.org/blog/how-km-can-support-diversity-equity-and-inclusion. Accessed March 2023.
- Valentine, M., Tan, T., Staats, B. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2017). Inequality in knowledge repository use in scaling service operations. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit Working Paper, (13-001), 2012-1. Google Scholar
- Wilson, T. D. (2002). The nonsense of knowledge management. Information Research, 8(1), 8–1. Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada Kimiz Dalkir
- Kimiz Dalkir
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
- Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania Constantin Bratianu
- International Burch University, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina Meliha Handzic
- University of Padova, Padova and Venice International University, Venice, Italy Ettore Bolisani
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dalkir, K. (2023). Key Milestones in the Evolution of Knowledge Management: What Is Next?. In: Bratianu, C., Handzic, M., Bolisani, E. (eds) The Future of Knowledge Management. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38696-1_3
Download citation
- DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38696-1_3
- Published : 11 November 2023
- Publisher Name : Springer, Cham
- Print ISBN : 978-3-031-38695-4
- Online ISBN : 978-3-031-38696-1
- eBook Packages : Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Get shareable link
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Copy to clipboard
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative